It’s finally here, the next big thing-Augmented Reality (AR) AR is finally moving from ‘a neat idea’ to ‘a necessary tool.’
Like any new technology, AR has gone through its awkward teenage years; clumsy, hasn’t grown into its ears, and doesn’t quite know what it wants to do with its life. It’s no different than the likes of portable computing, the smart phone, or any other modern technological marvel. (here’s a hilarious slide show of the early life of portable computing from itworld.com)
AR is finally coming into focus for many companies. People in various roles are starting to see how AR can reduce human errors, simplify the transfer of information, and provide insight to end users and managers alike. And I’m not even going to get into the endless possibilities involving customer engagement and experience. When a technology moves from video games and parlor tricks into serious applications like technical publications, assembly instructions, maintenance and support, and plant operations…it’s arrived.
Computing power and hardware has all but caught up to the demands of AR applications. Your company should either have, or be working on a strategy to take advantage of AR. If you don’t believe me, then maybe you’ll believe the Harvard Business Review. EAC Product Development Solutions is here to support your adoption of Augmented Reality and other Internet of Things (IoT) smart connected operations and product applications. Whether you’re getting a plan together, trying to obtain buy-in from the rest of your organization, selecting the right software platform, implementing a solution, or developing ‘experiences’ (that’s what AR and IoT applications are typically called); we’re here. We have teams of experts to make sure you successfully transform the way you design, manufacture, connect to, and service your products and organization.
As the leading PTC North American partner we offer our customers all of PTC’s technology solutions: ThingWorx, Windchill, Creo, Arbortext, Vuforia, Mathcad, etc. We also have a deep knowledge of the tools, applications, and configurations. This allows us to provide first-class consulting, implementation, and support services to ensure people like you are successful. Give us a call.
Part II – (You can read part 1 here) Evolving your BoM strategy, tools, and abilities. “EBoM vs. MBoM” transforms into “EBoM integrates with MBoM.” This integration includes associativity to one another, time saving tools, elimination of error prone manual steps & more.
Imagine eliminating the common disjointed processes, additional time, and error prone manual steps involved in the creation of downstream BoMs from Engineering into Manufacturing, Production and Service management.
Concepts & examples such as Manufacturing Bill of Materials (MBoM) are shown below, all under one system, integrated & associated, and created with a single click. Then they’re easily edited to meet downstream BoM needs.
BoM creation can be streamlined & improved by associatively creating downstream BoMs (S or M or other) and eventually, connecting them to your ERP system. For now, we’ll focus on the first step of this business transformation concept; the creation of the second, or downstream M or SBoM, starting with a simple EBoM example, created in minutes, and easily viewed & tracked.
Who should be involved in this topic at your company? Ideally, your Configuration Manager role should be leading or heavily involved in this process.
The starting point & tool is PTCs Windchill and your willingness to change & improve.
Once your CAD data is ready to check into Windchill, there is an option (check box) to auto-associate the EBoM to a downstream BoM such as an MBoM. It is a 1:1 relationship for starters. Options can branch out from here into many CM (Configuration Management) directions. Such as multi-level BoM management, uses, visualization and more.
Once created, you can manipulate & edit the default 1:1 downstream BoM to your needs; adding bulk items, manufacturing specific sub assemblies, (build throughs) even new service end items. You can also flatten out an EBoM to meet assembly or production needs. BoM items such as adhesive, lubricant, paint or coatings, packaging items, all things that typically are not on an EBoM, can and do belong on the M or SBoM.
If this fits your company’s needs? consider using Windchill’s auto-associate feature.
This article covers a couple examples. If this is not deep enough…here are even more tools to consider. Topics such as creating associated manufacturing instructions, work instructions, work plans and more. Change Management is shown as reference only, it is an optional element of Windchill for another blog.
There are many options to this topic, these are common examples that fit a lot of needs and is considered a starting point.
1stexample shows all BoM & change components all connected in one system vs. manually done in silo fashion, which is industry’s most common method today. These examples are shown in PTCs Windchill reference viewer tool, which ties all related objects into view for easy visibility with just a few clicks.
- 1. EBoM structure (highlighted in green)
- 2. Change requests, notices and tasks (highlighted in red)
- 3. MBoM structure (highlighted in blue) with their own, or connected Change Management Requests, Notices & Tasks
2ndexample shows an EBoM, SBoM (Service Kit in this example), with a saleable end item service kit, as well as components for service or manufacturing BoMs. It also shows Changes, these can also be created, edited, routed, approved or rejected, and even include the SBoM if need be.
Please connect with EAC to learn more, to discover your company’s transformation opportunities with an assessment, maybe see a demo, or attend a webinar. The goal is to help your company transform how you design, manufacture, connect to and service your products.
Designing a product without integrating simulation into your workflow is like giving a concert but never rehearsing. Why would you do that?
Top Performing organizations meet cost targets, remain on spending plans, and beat their due dates. One way they accomplish these objectives is by utilizing simulation tools to empower their organizations. Here’s 10 ways simulation will put you ahead.
1. Simulation software = better design decisions
Simulation tools enable engineers to have better insights throughout the design process.
For example, with the use of simulation engineers can conduct sensitivity studies, analyze trade-offs, remove excess materials and even evaluate motion envelopes.
By using simulation during concept design, engineers are able to explore and consider more options.
These options permit engineers to see the influences and effects of different design guidelines and limitations.
Testing many conditions, simulation software allows engineers to narrow down choices for the best concept.
This is how engineers are able to make better, highly informed design decisions.
2. Simulation helps avoid over engineering
By simulating your designs in a variety of environments, you can easily determine what is necessary within your design and what is not.
This helps engineers eliminate excess materials, and ultimately create better products.
3. With Simulation software, you find problems earlier (while they’re still cheap to fix)
Engineering simulation software helps organizations discover hidden interactions that can cause big problems.
How? It’s simple.
If the materials you’re using to build and design a product can’t perform under stress, you can find out early in the design process.
This helps your design team get it right the first time.
4. Simulation tools improve product quality
Simulation tools enable engineers to analyze and validate the performance of 3D virtual prototypes before the part itself is created.
With the ability to validate and test designs early in the design process, engineers are able to create and evaluate more concepts and ideas within allotted time frames.
This means more ideas, more designs, better quality and ultimately a better product.
5. Simulation software improves product reliability
With simulation software, results are accurate and reliable and can be easily calculated with very little input from engineers.
By using simulation-driven design to optimize product performance, quality and durability- you can be sure that your is more than reliable.
6. Simulation tools cut product development time
Organizations are able to reduce product development time with simulation tools because less time is needed for physical testing, fixing late problems, and rework.
When design engineers know how to run simulations, they understand the requirements for the analysis model. By taking these requirements into consideration as they design, model, and build products, the analysis becomes easier and takes less time to prepare.
7. Innovation is increased with simulation
With the help of simulation tools, engineers can also be more innovative.
Time-savings allotted from simulation and virtual prototypes enable design engineers to evaluate more design iterations.
8. Simulation helps you get to market faster
Simulation tools help streamline product development activities by enabling concurrent design and analysis.
How? It’s simple.
With simulation, the analysis process is faster. For instance, you can forget any reliance on 3rd parties for analysis because you are able to now do it in-house.
By identifying and eliminating errors early in the design process you will resolve errors early, eliminating late-stage changes and tedious rework. This will also greatly speed up your processes.
Simulation tools empower design engineers to make better design decisions.
Better design decisions ultimately produce more competitive products that cost less and get to market faster.
9. In the long run, simulation tools save costs
Simulation helps engineers make better design decisions at much less cost because they can subject virtual models to real-world forces.
By using fewer prototypes and focusing simulation on areas of high sensitivity and fatigue, an organization can save time and money.
For example, engineers can reduce product costs by optimizing designs to meet multiple objectives, such as maintaining a product’s strength while reducing its weight.
This is exactly how the use of analysis and early optimization to properly size geometry can reduce material costs.
Aside from material costs, how do product failures, warranty, and repair cost impact company profits? Tremendously.
Using simulation tools organizations can avoid costly recalls and reduce after-market service, warranty, and repair costs.
It’s easy to see how simulation tools will save you money simply by eliminating the need for project re-work, prototyping, and over-engineering
10. More competitive products
Simulation software provides engineers with additional insight, which leads to better design decisions and product optimization.
By using simulation, design engineers are able to develop higher quality products that are easily differentiated in the market.
The EAC Product Development Operating System is a framework that is based on three attributes of the product development system: that it is a competitive system; that its operation requires team-based participation from a broad range of contributors across the organization; and that it changes, evolves or decays, over time.
Many product developers have limited direct contact with their customers or their marketplace and lose sight of the competitive nature of their work. The rows of the PDOS matrix represent the three elements of a competitive system in the context of Product Development. Companies that look to capture the benefit of a competitive advantage from their product development competency cannot do so, without also addressing the needs and requirements of competitive systems.
The concept of teamwork in Product Development is well recognized and valued as a key to effective and efficient operation. Many will immediately think of the cross functional team that executes a project in adherence to an organization’s product development process. But as our model takes a systems view of which the process is a constituent element, our conception of the system team is higher level with the project team just one element of it. Product development system excellence is dependent upon individuals and teams in each hierarchical tier of the organization. These are responsible for supplying input to other subsystem elements of the model essential to these other subsystems’ effective operation. Our model represents this system team element as the columns of the PDOS matrix. These pillars of the system are labeled both with their functional role within the PDOS and with the tier of the organization responsible for that role.
The third attribute of our operating system is that it is dynamic. Without the investment of maintenance or improvement energy, entropy will degrade its structure and operation. On the other hand, a commitment to ongoing improvement will facilitate maturing of the system and carry it through the four levels of our maturity model. Our maturity model includes a system improvement tool that not only accelerates the rate of maturing but also damps the organizational turbulence often characteristic of transitions to a new level of maturity.
The subsystem elements of our model exist in the cells of our matrix. The relative strengths of these elements vary during progress to full maturity; at full maturity the seven elements interact in harmonic balance.
Three elements of a competitive system:
Our most visible competitive systems are sports franchises, and the keys to their success are instructive for business operation:
- Successful teams start with getting on the same page, literally. The team’s knowledge is captured in carefully guarded Playbooks and Game Plans. Everyone understanding the common goal and their role in it is a key to success. Successful, systematic businesses operate with shared goals that are captured in long term strategies, shorter term initiatives, and near term tactical plans.
- Teams invest time and energy in becoming more capable of competing well. The clearest example of this is practice, time spent working on improving the individual and collective skills that are brought to the competition. But the improvement to competence also includes improved infrastructure, equipment, anything that better positions the team to compete. Do businesses generally make this investment in planful improvement to their product development competency with the mind’s eye on the competitive nature of product development?
- And finally there is the competition itself. For teams the competition is head to head, and the metric is clear and clearly displayed on a scoreboard. In product development, the competing occurs in the execution of a program or project. The ultimate metric for product development is its productivity, total value created against the total investment made in creating this value. Execution of a project is the game, execution of the portfolio’s roadmap is the season. The ultimate competitive nature of product development is frequently lost in the common check-box nature of administrative project management.
The rows of the PDOS matrix:
In the EAC Product Development Operating System model, the rows represent the three elements of a competitive system. The Information row establishes the knowledge that must be shared – strategy, initiatives, tactics, process workflows – among all product development team members to create common goals and unify efforts. The Preparation row focuses on the improvement efforts that raise the level of corporate competence. And the Project row is where it all comes together, where we execute the game plan and compete.
Pillars of the System:
The columns of our system represent the pillars of the PDOS. Each pillar has two identifiers; the Product Development sub-team associated with that pillar and the focus of the contributing work done by that sub-team within that pillar.
Knowledge Base:
Knowledge is the Value currency of Product Development, and the PD Knowledge Base supports and glues together the other PD operational subsystems. The PD Information System, beyond housing data and information that serve as the building blocks of PD knowledge, also holds standards, transactional processes’ workflow, and functional tacit knowledge shared between project teammates. PLM has emerged as the critical PDIS tool.
Strategic Planning:
The work that culminates with a successful new product being delivered to market initiates with the development of a Strategic Plan. The compass heading provided by the plan informs decision making throughout the organization, including within the other PDOS subsystems. Critical decisions regarding the investments in the development of core and other competencies, as well as of new products align to the strategy.
Innovation (New Knowledge):
The Innovation subsystem elevates the competitive capability of the organization, its competences. It creates new knowledge in the form of disruptive technologies and novel methods of applying current technologies. It focuses on challenging all existing organizational standards, looking to continuously improve how it operates, and to compete in the marketplace from a position of greater strength and competitive advantage.
Expert Workforce Development:
In any competitive venue, it is understood that success ultimately relies on having great players. The competitive performance of your players is developed outside of the bounds of the competition itself. The intention of, commitment to and execution of investing in all of your product-development-critical subject matter experts – your assets –not only directly results in a more competitive team, but facilitates the recruitment of additional skilled players.
Investment Strategy:
The actual marketplace competition fulfilled by product development begins with strategic decisions about how to execute the product roadmap and elaborate the product portfolio. The informed decisions that lead to the significant investments incurred by product development create both the range and limits on profitability and corporate growth over the mid-range future. This late maturing subsystem determines the level at which you’ll compete.
Knowledge Based Decision Making:
The Knowledge Based Decision Making subsystem is the Product Development sibling to the executive function’s Fact Based Decision Making. While KBDM permeates successful Product Development organizations, in the actual competitive venue of development projects, the critical decisions that are captured as the product Concept are informed by pre-existing and newly generated knowledge of the marketplace and of corporate capabilities.
Project Execution:
The Project Execution subsystem is the part of the Product Development System that in the most narrow of views is seen as Product Development. The realization of the expanded view of the Product Development System does not diminish the critical importance of execution. Supported by new execution paradigms and product development specific information technology tools, longed for improvements in project predictability and reliability are now being achieved.
Tiers of the Organization:
Each of the three tiers in the organizational hierarchy – the executive, the managerial, and the individual functional specialist tiers – makes critical contributions to the effective functioning of a fully developed product development system.
Functional Roles within the PDOS:
The Product Development System Team comprises members in the executive, managerial, and individual subject matter layers of the organization. Each tier of the organization contributes to the effectivity of the system:
Executives set strategic direction, including the investment strategy for product development.
Directors and managers are guardians of critical product development knowledge and responsible for seeing that the right knowledge is available to the right individuals at the right time.
The functional specialists, subject matter experts generate new knowledge and use this and pre-existing knowledge in the execution of product development projects.
Maturity Model:
The EAC Maturity Model is a four level model that distinguishes the degree of structure and organization in the product development system at different periods in the evolution of the competency. The four maturity levels are:
- Tribal & Heroic
- Silo’ed
- Systematic
- Intelligent (self-managing)
System Improvement Tool:
EAC recognizes the value to both the rate of maturing and the ultimate level of maturity that is provided by a well ingrained root-cause problem solving system. The best of these are based on the PDCA cycle, also known as the Deming Cycle. Developed at Bell Labs in the early 20thcentury, and introduced to Japan in the wake of World War II, PDCA played a significant role in the rapid recovery and rise of Japanese industry. A particular version of PDCA was developed by Allen Ward, modeled on the way PDCA is executed at Toyota, and tailored by Ward to suit the way Americans prefer to work.
In this article you will learn what Creo Illustrate can do for you, and exactly what value it brings to the table.
You will also discover how Creo Illustrate addresses many issues faced by OEMs and engineering organizations.
In order to fully grasp what Creo Illustrate can do for you, you must understand the current market situation.
Regardless of your industry, the current market is complex.
Here are some of the reasons why.
Customer demands are continually increasing, and manufacturers have responded by delivering more complex products.
For example, customers demand configurable products. These same customers are also demanding higher product performance, increased uptime, and low total cost of ownership.
In addition to customer demands, we are also dealing with younger generations.
These young generations commonly resort to graphical illustrations or channels such as YouTube for guidance on how to do things. Because of these new tendencies, companies must adapt the ways they produce information according to the needs of the young generation.
Aside from the complexities of increased demands and young generations, organizations strive to capture global markets.
To capture global markets, organizations need to translate much of the documentation and product information that gets shipped.
Lastly, to remain competitive organizations must reduce time to market.
Altogether, this market situation creates significant pressure.
Organizations must make products that are more deliverable, improve customer experience, reduce cost, all while improving overall time to market.
How Creo Illustrate addresses the complex market situation.
1. Creo Illustrate helps deliver more configurable products
Leveraging Creo Illustrate and some other tools you can you can produce accurate configuration specific illustrations.
This provides product-specific product information to end user and consumers as well as highly skilled field technicians.
2. Creo Illustrate helps improve customer satisfaction
In order to improve customer satisfaction, you must enhance the overall customer experience.
By using Creo Illustrate you can create interactive graphical information that is easy to understand and interpret regardless of the native language.
3. Creo Illustrate helps lower costs
Lowering costs is an essential part of a competitive business.
Using Creo Illustrate you can leverage the CAD data you’ve already produced for downstream deliverables; work instructions, manuals, etc. This helps reduce redundant illustration and tracing effort, and keeps your technical communications up to date – event if documentation is created in parallel with the engineering and design process.
4. Creo Illustrate helps reduce time to market
Creo Illustrate helps streamline the process of creating illustrations and animations of your products. It eliminates the need to interrupt Engineering to gather screenshots of products and then laboriously trace images to create thin/thick illustrations. This allows you to accelerate the end-to-end creation, management, and publishing of dynamic technical information.
Having more technical illustrations than information is beneficial in many ways—and the solution to do so is easier than you think.
Here’s why you should be using more technical illustrations and the best way to create them.
Technical Illustrations are Easy to Understand
We all know the saying “ a picture paints a thousand words”—and in this case, it’s more than true.
It’s much easier to interpret a picture than to understand and read through lots of text. Using illustrations in tech pubs, user manuals, and service manuals reduce user errors.
Illustrations Take Away the Need for Text
Have you ever bought anything from Ikea? Sure you have! They sell their flat pack furniture all over the globe using the same manuals. That is the power of illustrations. You can drastically reduce the amount of text that is needed by producing illustrations.
Using Technical Illustrations Reduces the Need for Translation
With less text that is needed or used, you can reduce your translation costs.
So Why Doesn’t Everyone Use Illustrations?
The traditional process to create illustrations is time-consuming and can be froth with problems.
Let me illustrate it for you.
Odds are if you are using the traditional illustration process, your technical illustrators most likely work with engineers to get snapshots of CAD information to use in illustrations.
These snapshots are usually static because they are captured at only a moment in time, usually near the end of the product development process.
Because the illustrations are static, they are not always easy to interpret. This means the text is still required to properly convey the information.
If your snapshots were taken at the end of the product development process because there was ‘ less likelihood of the product changing’ – you could be delaying your shipment process.
Often a product cannot ship until the technical information that is associated with it is ready to ship with the product.
Now consider all the back and forth communication between both the engineering department and the illustration group.
Traditional illustrations are difficult to keep up to date. Commonly the illustrator needs to go back to the engineer for updates every time there is a change to the product.
If at any time there is a miscommunication, your illustrations could easily become inaccurate; exposing your organization to the risk of unsatisfied customers, frustrated field technicians, and the possibility of lawsuits.
It’s easy to see why the traditional methods to create illustrations are downright time consuming and prone to error.
So How Can You Make Technical Illustrations Easily?
The answer is Creo Illustrate.
Creo Illustrate leverages CAD data to create illustrations that, depending on your PDM/PLM setup, maintain an associative link to the original CAD data.
This means any changes you make with your CAD data can automatically update all your illustrations and possibly your publications.
With Creo Illustrate you have the ability to start creating illustrations early on in the product development process, with a guarantee that your illustrations are always kept up-to-date. Start developing product documentation during the product development process instead of after the product development process.
See Creo Illustrate in action! Watch this short video.
